Philopatry

Philopatry results in animals sharing a home range, which sets the stage for the evolution of social behaviors leading to both nepotistic interactions among kin and reciprocal altruism.

From: Advances in the Study of Behavior , 1997

Socially Induced Infertility, Incest Abstention and the Monopoly of Reproduction in Cooperatively Breeding African Mole-Rats, Family Bathyergidae

Nigel C. Bennett , ... Jennifer U.One thousand. Jarvis , in Advances in the Study of Behavior, 1999

A THE DRIVE TOWARD SOCIALITY–PHILOPATRY OR DISPERSAL

The choice between philopatry or dispersal at weaning in unlike species has been discussed past Koenig et al. (1992). The factors affecting the determination between them tin be summed up every bit: (one) the risks associated with dispersal, (2) the probability of finding a suitable territory and successful establishment therein, (3) the probability of obtaining a mate, and (4) the probability of successful independent reproduction. For the subterranean mole-rats, the very severe constraints of living underground add new dimensions to these choices that are not experienced by animals moving freely aboveground. Many of these constraints are exacerbated by the effects of aridity.

High energetic costs are incurred as mole-rats extend their burrows both in search of food and in attempting to disperse, detect a mate, and found a territory. This in upshot limits both of these activities to times when the costs of excavation and disposal of soil are at their lowest—times when the soil has been moistened by rain and is easy to work (Jarvis and Bennett, 1993; Jarvis et al., 1997; Vleck, 1979; 1981). It therefore follows that in arid regions, typically characterized past widely spaced and unpredictable rainfall, the opportunities open to the mole-rats for dispersal and for finding food are cursory and infrequent, whereas in mesic areas these opportunities are more numerous.

Our studies take too shown that although the accented corporeality of energy available to mole-rats is similar in arid and mesic areas (Fig. 4) (Bennett, 1988; Jarvis et al., 1994), the way in which it is dispersed is different. Densities are lower, but the absolute size of private food items is larger in more than arid regions than in the mesic ones. Nosotros likewise accept evidence (Jarvis et al., 1998) that the search for geophytes is blind in the respect that they do not utilise whatsoever sensory cues to straight them to an energy-rich patch of food.

Fig. four. A schematic representation of ecological factors influencing group size in the Bathyergidae. In barren regions opportunities are limited to extend foraging tunnels considering of insufficient rainfall (dotted line). This together with widely dispersed food precludes the survival of solitary species

 (modified from Jarvis et al., 1994, with permission from Elsevier Science).

Lovegrove and Wissel (1988) and Lovegrove (1991) developed a model which investigated the risks of unproductive foraging as a function of group size and the density and size of foods. Their model predicts that cooperative foraging reduces the hazard of unproductive foraging and therefore represents a more stable long-term option in arid habitats where resources tend to be large and widely dispersed. These factors would manifestly likewise severely reduce the chances of successful dispersal past single mole-rats. Lovegrove and Wissel'southward (1988) model besides suggested that energetic benefits of sociality could merely be realized if the full energy expenditure of the colony is minimized by reducing body size, mass-specific resting metabolic rates, and themoregulatory costs. They regarded the trend in the bathyergids toward mass-independent scaling of mass-specific resting metabolic rates equally an important factor in promoting sociality every bit a solution to environmental take a chance, and they termed it Risk-Sensitive Metabolism. Indeed, the thermoregulatory characteristics of the naked mole-rat, which has poikilothermic traits (Buffenstein & Yahav, 1991), would be i example of this. Limiting reproduction to a single female in the colony would too serve to limit the energy devoted to reproduction.

It therefore follows that in barren regions, both the limitation of there existence few occasions when conditions are ideal for burrowing and the high risks that the solitary dispersers face up in locating food volition promote philopatry and group-living in these mole-rats. Alexander, Noonan, and Crespi (1991) have proposed that an important gene in the evolution of insect eusociality is the availability of a permanent nest and they further suggest that the acquisition of a safe, expandable subterranean nest or burrow organisation, dug at considerable energetic cost to the colony, may accept promoted sociality in subterranean rodents. This again would be a potent limitation to dispersal in arid regions. Fifty-fifty for social fossorial mammals such as pine voles (Microtus pinetorum), which do not have to dig to disperse, the building of a new burrow arrangement is energetically expensive (Powell and Fried, 1992) and hence a significant constraint on successful dispersal. Other loftier risks would exist incurred by mole-rats in locating a mate in these regions. As yet information technology is not known how this is achieved, simply few animals are successful.

Contempo comparative studies, using an all-encompassing molecular phylogeny of the Bathyergidae to brand phylogenetically independent contrasts of sociality and ecological factors, have provided further back up for the nutrient aridity hypothesis. Maximum group sizes correlated significantly with the rainfall coefficient of variation and geophyte density (Faulkes et al., 1997a).

The advantages incurred by living in large groups in a harsh and unpredictable surround are well illustrated by ongoing field studies of a population of Damaraland mole-rats (Jarvis and Bennett 1993; Jarvis et al., 1998; Bennett and Jarvis, unpublished data). This study, in its 9th yr, has coincided with a drought in which there were years when periods of rainfall (and hence opportunities to disperse or locate new food) were spaced >   ten   months autonomously. Our investigations have revealed that large colonies occupied territories that were significantly richer in resource than those of small colonies (Jarvis et al., 1998), the failure rate of small colonies was much higher than that of large colonies, and that big colonies connected to raise pups throughout the drought (Jarvis and Bennett, 1993; Jarvis et al., 1998). Territory quality likewise affected the success of individuals in dispersing and half as many individuals successfully dispersed (that is, were recaptured at least one time after dispersing) from colonies in lower quality areas than from the higher quality areas (Bennett and Jarvis, unpublished data). This may be because individuals in the larger colonies (in higher quality territories) can afford to expect for the best opportunity to disperse.

Read full chapter

URL:

https://world wide web.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0065345408602168

Sexual Disharmonize in Nonhuman Primates

Ryne A. Palombit , in Advances in the Study of Beliefs, 2014

3.three Social Defense: Female–Female Alliances

Brereton (1995) suggested that female person philopatry and gregariousness evolved in primates to reduce the costs of sexual compulsion (also equally infanticide), but direct prove of the underlying machinery(due south) and their relationship to variation in female–female bonds is limited ( Sterck, Watts, & van Schaik, 1997). Dilution furnishings have been noted for sexual coercion in other animals (Cappozzo et al., 2008; Connor et al., 2006; Dadda, Pilastro, & Bisazza, 2008; Pilastro et al., 2003), every bit has the related pathway of female person association with other females who are more bonny to males (as targets of copulation and coercion) (Brask, Croft, Thompson, Dabelsteen, & Darden, 2012). The more than ordinarily invoked mechanisms in nonhuman primates involve defensive alliances with other females (and occasionally juveniles).

Effective female–female person coalitions against sexual coercion are relatively rare, merely information technology is hit that they are successful in some of the same species in which they seem largely ineffectual against infanticide (Palombit, 2012). The reasons for this design are unclear but presumably involve the greater costs to females of anti-infanticide defense. Explanations for variation in the effectiveness of individual and coalitionary deterrence of sexual coercion have mostly focused on sexual dimorphism. Thus, the argument of van Schaik, Hodges, and Nunn (2000) that sexual coercion is express to catarrhines is based partly upon the greater dimorphism of these forms, facilitated in part past greater terrestriality (come across also van Schaik et al., 2004). This hypothesis is supported by the low rates of coercion reported in catarrhines of low to moderate dimorphism, such equally some guenons (Cords, 1986, 2002b; Henzi & Lawes, 1987), Barbary macaques (run across in a higher place), Temminck's red colobus monkey (Procolobus badius temminckii) (Starin, 1981), and bonobos (Paoli, 2009; Surbeck & Hohmann, 2013; Table 5.4).

But dimorphism does not explain all the variation. First, low rates of sexual compulsion are known for some relatively dimorphic taxa (east.g., mantled howler monkeys, Jones, 1985; geladas, Dunbar, 1984). This is sometimes because of the effectiveness of female coalitions (see Table 5.4). For example, coalitions in patas monkeys are rare but withal limit male person aggressive beliefs (Chism & Rogers, 1997; Rowell & Chism, 1986). Female geladas take very strong social relationships with one another (Johnson, Snyder-Mackler, Beehner, & Bergman, 2014) based in role on coalitionary support. Although coalitions operate more commonly in intrasexual conflict (Dunbar, 1980), females can and do target the resident male person of their unit of measurement, specially in the context of thwarting his assailment or herding attempts. Ultimately, cooperating females "are able to counteract the potential advantage that the male person has by virtue of his greater size and forcefulness," producing a unit in which he has a much weaker position than that of a male hamadryas birdie (Dunbar & Dunbar, 1975, p. 41). The reasons for variation in the effectiveness of female–female person coalitions in reducing male sexual compulsion in dimorphic species remain obscure, all the same.

Second, insufficiently intense coercion has been recorded in taxa non significantly more than dimorphic than some of the "noncoercive" species (e.1000., chimpanzees and Thomas' leaf monkeys). Moreover, dimorphism does not easily explicate intraspecific variation. For example, the chimpanzees at the Taï Woods (Cote d'ivoire) have comparable levels of dimorphism only patently less effective sexual coercion than their E African cousins (Stumpf & Boesch, 2010). This contrast is difficult to explain but may be due in office to the Taï females' ability to influence male dominance relationships (Stumpf & Boesch, 2006). Moreover, female chimpanzees in another East African population at Budongo frequently form coalitions that do non necessarily reduce the rate of male aggression, but seem to reduce its intensity and price (Newton-Fisher, 2006). In the case of both Taï and Budongo, these outcomes are likely to exist facilitated by the greater female gregariousness permitted past ecological conditions. A final, related question is whether reduced dimorphism itself constitutes an evolved counterstrategy to sexual coercion in some taxa, as suggested by Smuts and Smuts (1993). Kappeler (2012b), however, concludes that, at least in lemurs, monomorphism derives adaptively from female–female competition rather than pick to counter male coercion. Another perspective on this process is provided past Lindenfors (2002), who argues that the decreased reproductive rates among female haplorrhines in more polygynous clades reflect sexually combative selection favoring big male body size at the expense of female person fitness.

A variant of this coalitionary hypothesis is that harassment and break of copulations by females or immature individuals in the group functions to protect the mating female from aggression from the male partner (Gouzoules, 1974; reviewed by Niemeyer & Anderson, 1983). The immatures involved are sometimes related to the female person. In a directly test of the hypothesis in a species showing high levels of such harassment (stump-tailed macaques), Niemeyer and Anderson (1983) found no supporting evidence. Other functions accept been proposed, including competition amid females (eastward.1000., disruption of fertilization schedules), or among males, and mediation of kin relations (Bruce & Estep, 1992; Loy & Loy, 1977; Niemeyer & Chamove, 1983; Qi et al., 2011; Small, 1988; Sommer, 1989).

Read full chapter

URL:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128002865000055

The evolution of delayed dispersal and different routes to convenance in social birds

Sjouke A. Kingma , ... Jan Komdeur , in Advances in the Study of Behavior, 2021

3.2 Subordinate survival: Costs of actress-territorial movement vs survival benefits of philopatry

As office of the survival component of the benefits-of-philopatry hypothesis, many studies of delayed dispersal have focused on benefits in the natal territory like nepotism, reduced predation and college nutrient availability (reviewed in, e.m., Cockburn, 1998; Covas & Griesser, 2007; Ekman et al., 2001, 2004; Koenig et al., 1992, 2009, 2016; Shen et al., 2017; Walters, Copeyon, & Carter, 1992; Walters, Doerr, & Carter, 1992). The survival benefits of philopatry are very like for philopatric individuals that eventually inherit, shift, or bud, and presumably quite similar for staging individuals, and could explain why individuals exercise not bladder. Floaters leave all benefits of philopatry behind (Baglione, Canestrari, Marcos, & Ekman, 2006; Ekman et al., 2000; Griesser et al., 2006; Koenig et al., 1992; Zack, 1990; Table 1) and experience energetic and survival costs associated with extra-territorial movement (Bonte et al., 2012; Table 3). The costs of floating are probably more permanent and severe than those of prospecting or staging; a comparison of the costs of prospecting and floating (provided in Table three) suggests that floating more often leads to reduced survival (in at least 6 of 7 species) than prospecting (one of 3 species).

Whether the costs of floating and the benefits of philopatry (partly) drive delayed dispersal probably depends on a suite of determining factors (Fig. 2). First, predation risk outside a territory may limit the motivation for subordinates to leave a "condom-oasis." This is determined by both predator density and the power of individuals to bladder in coalitions to increment predator detection and dilute predation risk (Ridley, 2012). Conversely, living in a natal territory where predation risk is relatively high probably encourages individuals to go out. Second, individuals may be less probable to phase, prospect or float if natal food availability (determined by habitat quality and grouping size and limerick; Dickinson et al., 2014; Ekman et al., 1999) is high (Baglione et al., 2006; Dickinson & McGowan, 2005; Komdeur, 1992; Stacey & Ligon, 1987, 1991; merely see Barve, Hagemeyer, et al., 2020), or when there are large stretches of non-traversable areas (Brooker, Brooker, & Cale, 1999). While the prediction that individuals from expert quality territories should delay dispersal is quite prominent, such individuals may also exist in good condition and/or be expert competitors, and so that they may be more motivated to prospect or float. This contrast illustrates the difficulty of seemingly straightforward predictions, and highlights the importance of assessing whether and how individuals' condition affects the link betwixt territory quality and prospecting and floating. Third, individuals may make up one's mind to prospect or float if their competitive ability while encountering conspecifics in other territories is high or the energetic costs of extra-territorial movement is relatively depression. Therefore, size, sex, age, and other intrinsic factors that determine competitive ability, and whether individuals can bladder in coalitions, can all contribute to whether individuals motility outside the territory (Fig. 2). Final, an important determinant for subordinates to stay is the acceptance of breeders (e.g., nepotism) and other subordinates (Nelson-Blossom et al., 2018). While nepotism in itself is a well-established gene in explaining delayed dispersal (Ekman et al., 2004), we emphasize here that information technology is particularly important to empirically decide whether individuals are forced or voluntarily leave a natal territory, as this can obscure the importance of other factors in explaining whether individuals stay or leave.

Many studies have recognized that combining the benefits of philopatry and the costs of floating are crucial in understanding delayed dispersal (Chocolate-brown, 1987; Delgado et al., 2014; Ekman, 2006; Koenig et al., 1992; Kokko & Ekman, 2002; Russell, 2004). However, these costs and benefits only cover the survival component every bit subordinate. For example, the survival benefits of philopatry may have to be traded off against floating, which is riskier just may besides yield a higher probability of obtaining a breeding position (encounter Kingma, Bebbington, et al., 2016). Therefore, unless individuals obtain sufficient direct or indirect reproductive fettle as subordinate (which appears to be rare; Section 3.one), the subordinate stage alone cannot fully explain choice on delayed dispersal because individuals ultimately crave a convenance position to reproduce, which we outline in the next Sections 3.iii and iii.iv.

Read total chapter

URL:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0065345421000036

Sociality, Grouping Size, and Reproductive, Suppression among Carnivores

Scott Creel , David Macdonald , in Advances in the Study of Behavior, 1995

B CONSTRAINTS ON DISPERSAL AND Retentivity OF Adult OFFSPRING

Ane evolutionary route to sociality is through nondispersal of young or natal philopatry ( Brownish, 1974; Waser and Jones, 1983). In many mammals (reviews in Waser and Jones, 1983, and Emlen, 1991), including most carnivores, social breeding groups practice indeed form by offspring remaining across the historic period of sexual maturity (although groups in nigh socially breeding carnivores include adult immigrants of at least one sex). Nondispersers avoid the bloodshed risks of dispersal, which can be substantial (Waser et al., 1994). They may inherit a proven territory (Woolfenden and Fitzpatrick, 1984; Brown, 1987) and they may gain indirect fettle past helping relatives on their natal territory (Hamilton, 1963, 1964; Chocolate-brown, 1987).

The particular ecological or demographic constraints that favor nondispersal vary among species. Early work focused on habitat saturation, the situation in which suitable habitat is completely occupied (Selander, 1964; Brown, 1974; Stacey, 1979). Habitat saturation has been invoked to explain social breeding in carnivores (review in Macdonald and Moehlman, 1982), merely, as discussed below, other constraints are likely to interact with habitat availability.

A serious difficulty exists in testing for habitat saturation in the field: how can suitable habitat be identified, independently of whether it is occupied or non? Furthermore, avian studies accept revealed instances in which evidently suitable habitat remained unoccupied despite a nearby pool of potential dispersers (Rabenold, 1984; Stacey and Ligon, 1987). A parallel amongst carnivores is provided past badger groups from which individuals did not disperse into adjoining vacant territories (Cheeseman, Mallinson, Ryan, and Wilesmith, 1993). Such problems spurred avian population biologists to accost continuous variation in habitat quality, rather than classifying habitats as suitable or not (Koenig and Pitelka, 1981; Stacey and Ligon, 1987). Emlen (1991) has used the term generalized constraints to broaden the basic concept of habitat saturation: ecological or demographic constraints may be such that dispersal leads to lower reproductive success than does nondispersal.

In the broader context of generalized constraints on independent breeding, several factors can affect the expected payoff to dispersers. If vacant habitat is of poor quality, the reproductive success expected from an independent breeding endeavor may be sufficiently depression to tip the balance in favor of nondispersal (Koenig and Pitelka, 1981). In some social carnivores, helpers are necessary for successful reproduction (e.yard., African wild dogs, Reich, 1981; Malcolm and Marten, 1982; dwarf mongooses, Creel, 1990). Lack of a labor strength precludes independent convenance in these species, and would selectively favor nondispersal in any species where helpers increment reproductive success (Brown, 1987: some authors consider the labor force an extended aspect of territory quality [e.g., Woolfenden and Fitzpatrick, 1984]). The necessity for a prepare-fabricated labor force, together with the benefits of strength in numbers in taking over a new group may explain why in some social carnivores members of at least 1 sex activity may disperse in groups (male and female person wild dogs, Fuller et al., 1992; male person and female person meerkats, Macdonald, 1992; female badgers, Woodroffe and Macdonald, 1993; male and female dwarf mongooses, Rood, 1987; male cheetahs, Caro and Collins, 1987). Nondispersal and dependence on helpers for reproduction may form a positive feedback loop, so that increasing energetic dependence on helpers may create option for increasing group size (Creel and Creel, 1991) and expansionism (sensu Kruuk and Macdonald, 1985). Finally, a biased sex ratio can limit breeding opportunities for dispersers of the more than abundant sex (e.k., wild dogs, Frame et al., 1979; Reich, 1981; Malcolm and Marten, 1982; encounter also Reyer, 1980). A event of all these constraints on dispersal is that individuals may try to hedge their bets. Among canids, for example, male person crab-eating foxes may disperse, establish a breeding territory close to their natal range, and, following the death of their mate, render home to tend the next generation of their parents' cubs (Macdonald and Courtenay, submitted). Female African wild dogs sometimes return to their natal grouping following a protracted dispersal, presumably because they failed to find a breeding opportunity (Due south. Creel, personal observation).

Among carnivores, dispersal itself may be inherently risky, regardless of demographic weather condition or habitat saturation. Small carnivores are highly susceptible to predation, both by raptors (Rood, 1990) and larger carnivores (Sunquist and Sunquist, 1989; Rood, 1990), and dispersal probably amplifies predation risk (Waser et al., 1994). Intraspecifically, carnivores' adaptations for killing casualty can exist put to fatal utilise in fights between residents and immigrants. Serious injuries or fatalities from intraspecific fights have been documented in species every bit small as 350-g dwarf mongooses (loss of digits and peradventure limbs, Southward. Creel, personal observation), 1-kg banded mongooses (fatalities, M. Murray and J. Rood, personal communication), 22-kg African wild dogs (disembowelment. Frame and Frame, 1981), 35-kg wolves (fatalities. E. Klinghammer, personal communication) l-kg cheetahs (fatalities. Caro, 1994) and 165-kg lions (fatalities. Packer, 1986).

Well-nigh of the above constraints on dispersal are difficult to quantify in practice. Estimates of dispersal adventure are well-nigh absent from the literature (Chepko-Sade and Halpin, 1987; Johnson and Gaines, 1990; Waser et al., 1994). Sometimes a habitat constraint is clearcut, such equally the restricted

Afro-alpine meadows occupied past Ethiopian wolves (Sillero-Zubiri, 1994), but habitat suitability is often hard to assess objectively, and estimates of habitat quality depend on identifying and measuring all relevant variables. Proxy variables such as rainfall or habitat type are common (due east.g., Vehrencamp, Koford, and Bowen, 1988; Waser et al., in press). Beyond these practical problems, interactions between factors are probable to have a potent consequence on the overall forcefulness of constraint on dispersal. For instance, where habitat is adequately saturated, the likelihood of ambitious encounters with conspecifics will be high, but the likelihood of remaining without a labor forcefulness will exist low. Post-obit Emlen (1991), all constraints can be quantitatively incorporated past taking the product of three quantities: (ane) the probability of surviving dispersal; (2) the probability of securing a mate; and (3) expected reproductive success post-obit successful dispersal. Where this product (plus any indirect fettle accrued afterward dispersal; Creel and Waser, 1994) is less than the inclusive fettle accrueing to nondispersers, selection favors remaining in the natal group (e.g., dwarf mongooses of some age–sex classes; Creel and Waser, 1994).

Read full chapter

URL:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/commodity/pii/S0065345408603952

Movement: Search, Navigation, Migration, and Dispersal

Michael D. Brood , Janice Moore , in Animal Beliefs, 2012

Males Versus Females

In virtually mammals, males are the dispersing sex activity, 70 whereas in virtually birds, females are more than likely to disperse. 71 The general argument is that mammals tend to be polygynous—live in social groups in which one male is associated with many females. Wild horses are a familiar case of this type of system. (Encounter Chapter xi on mating systems for more than details on polygyny.) Birds, on the other hand, tend to be monogamous and to have territorial males, leading to a situation in which females disperse to search out male territory holders. When exceptions occur, such every bit chocolate-brown jays, in which males are more likely to disperse, 72 or hamadryas baboons, in which females are more probable to disperse, 73 complex social dynamics seem involved in the evolution of these exceptions to the general rules about gender-specific dispersal.

The case of prairie dogs is consistent with the conventional wisdom about mammalian dispersal. Prairie dogs alive in dense colonies, which are subdivided into burrow systems occupied by families (coteries; come across Figure 8.30). Two species of prairie dog, Gunnison'due south and the black-tailed prairie dog, accept been well studied; the biological science of the species differs, merely the overall pattern of dispersal behavior and colony structure is similar betwixt the species. Immature males are the primary dispersers and tin can move a few kilometers to bring together a new colony; young females remain in their natal colony. This model of male dispersal and female philopatry (a tendency for an animal to remain close to, or return to, the animal's birthplace) facilitates inbreeding avoidance. 74 Prairie dogs tend to decimate the vegetation in their colony; because of this, sites on the edges of the colony may be favored because the fodder is better. Perhaps for this reason, some dispersal of older animals also takes place, with older males and females equally likely to motility.

Effigy eight.thirty. Young male person prairie dogs disperse from their natal grouping; females remain, then prairie dog colonies are matrilineal.

 Photo: Jeff Mitton.

Young dispersing male mammals sometimes form coalitions with other males in similar circumstances, forming "bachelor herds." Males in bachelor herds benefit from shared vigilance and shared information about feeding and watering locations, and too serve every bit foils in practice gainsay. Bachelor herds are common in ungulates, such equally horses, mount sheep, and deer, but are besides found in marine mammals and in lions.

Mammalian females may exit social groups to discover better locations for the nascence and feeding of their young. This type of dispersal may protect the young from potential infanticide by adult males, and is well known in a variety of primates. Maternal dispersal is usually reversible, and once the juvenile is former enough, the female parent and infant return to the social grouping. In some cases, though, dispersing meaning females are responding to competitive conditions and, while pregnant, search for new suitable habitat.

Read full chapter

URL:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/commodity/pii/B9780123725813000088

Sociality, Evolution of

B. Crespi , in International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2001

three.1 Habitat

Cooperation in reproduction is concentrated in habitats that select for juveniles to stay at home after reaching adulthood, because of benefits to philopatry and costs to dispersal and independent reproduction. Amongst social vertebrates, the preponderance of social species are territorial and alive in environments where contained convenance opportunities appear more than limited than in related non-social taxa (Brown 1974, Emlen 1982). Indeed, many studies have shown a positive clan betwixt the degree of 'ecological constraint' on independent reproduction (measured in terms of some attribute of habitat availability) and the extent to which the offspring of a set of parents stay at domicile to serve every bit 'helpers,' forming a cooperative-breeding social system. By staying at dwelling, such offspring may be able to increase their inclusive fettle via altruism towards relatives, they may eventually inherit the territory, or they may merely proceeds a favorable environment in which to wait for a convenance opportunity to arise elsewhere.

Amidst social invertebrates, sociality is more or less restricted to species that alive in improvable, expansible, or defensible microhabitats that serve either as nurseries or as combined nurseries and food-rich sites (Alexander et al. 1991). For example, social aphids and thrips live in galls (hollow modified leaves or stems), social encyrtid wasps live in the body cavities of their hosts, social bawl beetles alive in the heartwood of trees, social snapping shrimp live in sponges, and most social Hymenoptera live in nests in the basis, in stems, or in wood (Choe and Crespi 1997). These habitats are especially valuable and tend to select for offspring philopatry and helping beliefs, in the same fashion every bit do the territories of social vertebrates (Strassmann and Queller 1989). The ii species of social mole rat provide a striking link between the invertebrates and vertebrates: both live in colonies clandestine in expansible burrows like bees, ants, or termites, and, like social thrips, aphids, shrimp, and some termites, their nutrient is available at the nest site.

Although cooperation is conspicuously associated with particular sorts of habitat in both vertebrates and invertebrates, few studies have yet to compare social taxa to closely-related non-social taxa, with regard to the specific characteristics of habitats believed to be important. Moreover, researchers are merely beginning to link differences in habitat characteristics to differences in social system, to discern what aspects of habitat tend to select for communal, cooperative breeding, or eusocial beliefs. The nigh obvious design to date is that virtually all species living in habitats that combine food and shelter, such that the colony members demand not leave their domicile during the menstruation of rearing offspring, exhibit eusociality, if they too have predators and the ability to defend against them (Crespi 1994).

Read total chapter

URL:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B0080430767031041

Behavioral ecology of tropical animals

Kay E. Holekamp , Stephanie Yard. Dloniak , in Advances in the Study of Behavior, 2010

D Conclusions

To summarize, certain aspects of the behavioral ecology of spotted hyenas vary remarkably little among various study areas. These include female dominance over males, fission–fusion sociality, male dispersal, female philopatry, the hierarchical organization of individual clans, and the rank-related maternal furnishings that ensue from this hierarchical organization. Other phenomena that appear to be invariant, but have non nevertheless been widely studied, include basic patterns of cub rearing and protracted development of a feeding apparatus specialized for durophagy. Recent work by Watts et al. (2009) suggests that hyena traits associated with clan structure and maternal rank effects, which appear non to vary across the species' range, were favored by pick for enhanced female aggressiveness to permit their young to feed at carcasses. Even long afterwards puberty, young hyenas are handicapped during competitive feeding because constrained evolution of the feeding apparatus causes them to ingest both hard and soft foods more slowly than adults (Tanner et al., 2010; Watts et al., 2009).

Read full chapter

URL:

https://world wide web.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0065345410420069

Sneakers, Satellites, and Helpers: Parasitic and Cooperative Behavior in Fish Reproduction

Michael Taborsky , in Advances in the Written report of Behavior, 1994

one Intraspecific Adoptions

In many cichlid species, groups of young that are guarded by parental adults may belong to different size/historic period classes. In substrate brooding, permanently territorial species, this may be a effect of prolonged filial philopatry, which may result in helper systems (come across the post-obit). In the majority of cases, all the same, it is more than probable that this intraspecific mixing of broods results from adoptions of strange immature. Adoptions can exist easily induced experimentally, in both the aquarium and field (e.g., Greenberg, 1963; Sjolander, 1972; Noakes and Barlow, 1973; McKaye and McKaye, 1977; Carlisle, 1985; Wisenden and Keenleyside, 1992), with conspecifics and with young of other species (e.g., Noble and Curtis, 1939; Collins and Braddock, 1962; Myrberg, 1964; Mrowka, 1987a). They also occur on their ain, that is, without experimental manipulation (e.g., Burchard, 1965; Baylis, 1974; McKaye and McKaye, 1977; Mrowka, 1987b).

The chances of witnessing adoptions in an undisturbed situation are very low. Therefore, the occurrence of adoptions is ordinarily deduced from the fact that broods incorporate unlike size classes, or because broods increase in size (McKaye and McKaye, 1977). Table Three lists species in which intraspecific adoptions accept been directly observed or can be safely assumed to occur from these indirect cues.

At that place are several possible reasons for the occurrence of adoptions. Unfortunately, no cost/benefit analyses have been performed yet to study the ultimate (i.eastward., evolutionary) reasons. Nosotros may expect dissimilar mechanisms of offspring transfer between broodcaring adults, depending on whether information technology is advantageous to donors or stepparents, or to both. Information on who initiates the transfer of offspring may provide some hint as to who will ultimately do good from it (although nonadaptive "mistakes" and "accidents" are potential alternatives).

Kidnapping has been observed in the Midas cichlid, Cichlasoma citrinellum (McKaye and McKaye, 1977), in the orange chromide, Etroplus maculatus (G. W. Barlow, unpublished observations, cited in McKaye and McKaye (1977), in Apistogramma borellii (Dieke, 1993), and in Pseudocrenilabrus multicolor (Mrowka, 1987). The latter is a maternal mouth-brooder, and kidnapping refers hither to an interference of strange females at spawning and accept upwards of eggs by these interlopers. The stealing of eggs or young may have a positive dilution outcome on the kidnapper's own young when predation on offspring occurs (McKaye and McKaye, 1977). Wisenden and Keenleyside (1992) suggested that this potential antipredation function of brood adoptions may be the reason why in many species only young of equal or smaller sizes than their ain offspring are accepted, every bit predator efficiency is negatively correlated with prey size.

Farming out of broods is a term used for a behavior by which parents actively transfer young to strange broodcaring adults (with reference to "egg dumping," this behavior might exist called immature dumping). This was observed in the Tanganyika cichlid Perissodus microlepis (Yanagisawa, 1985a). Information technology only happened when one parent was left with the brood, either considering its partner has been experimentally removed or had disappeared for unknown reasons. Yanagisawa argued that the reduced chances of raising a brood lonely would make farming out very profitable for single parents. This may also hold for captive cichlids. When the males of broodcaring pairs of Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum were experimentally removed by Wisenden and Keenleyside (1992), the transfer probability of the brood to other pairs with young increased. In the African mouthbrooder Xenotilapia flavipinnis, farming out was observed when both parents were nonetheless in charge of the brood (Yanagisawa, 1985b, 1986). Generally, as the transfer of young is initiated by donors, information technology is likely that they are gaining more from this behavior than the stepparents do, in exact contrast to the previously discussed phenomenon of kidnapping. As a consequence, donors should be expected to transfer their offspring to parents caring for immature that are still smaller than their own, for the same reasons equally Wisenden and Keenleyside (1992) hypothesized that kidnappers should preferably steal offspring that are smaller than their ain.

In that location are two other possibilities for how young of different parents may coalesce. When brood-tending adults meet, their young may join the wrong school (family conflux). This is especially probable to happen in species lacking stable territories. It may result in reciprocal adoption, in the displacement of parents (Wisenden and Keenleyside, 1992), or in the collection of all immature with the most aggressive parents (Baylis, 1974). Alternatively, immature may independently join a guarded brood, after separation from their ain parents (independent offspring inclusion). Big offspring of the damselfish Acanthochromis polyacanthus are expelled at some stage past their parents. They may so join a neighboring school of young that is still guarded by adults (Thresher, 1985). The latter appear incapable of separating the 2 groups of young and expelling the interlopers.

Both family unit conflux and independent offspring inclusion may be beneficial, costly, or neutral to stepparents. Information technology is not possible to assess the likely payoff from the form of this behavior alone; measurements of offspring survival are required to unravel this phenomenon.

Read full chapter

URL:

https://world wide web.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0065345408603514

Volume 3

Marker C. Mainwaring , Ian R. Hartley , in Encyclopedia of Animal Beliefs (Second Edition), 2019

Abstract

Blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus ) are amongst the most frequently used model species in behavioural research of wild vertebrates, which is primarily because of their willingness to breed in nestboxes and their tolerance of monitoring activities and experimental manipulations. Their loftier levels of natal philopatry and low convenance dispersal distances take enabled researchers to perform longitudinal studies throughout private's lives and from i generation to the side by side, and the combination of these amenable traits have provided researchers with unparalleled opportunities to examine birds in a level of detail that would be virtually impossible in not-nestbox breeding species. Consequently, bluish tits are widely used as model systems in a range of behavioural studies, and here we focus on five areas where blue tits accept contributed significantly to our agreement of brute behaviour: learning and innovation, interspecific competition, public information use, sexual choice and family life, before suggesting those areas where further research is warranted.

Read total chapter

URL:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128096338907106

Social Behavior, Cooperation, and Kinship

Michael D. Breed , Janice Moore , in Creature Beliefs (Second Edition), 2016

Aggregated Nesting

Sometimes animals dodder their nests together in a single location. Why they practise this is 1 of the more intriguing mysteries in animate being behavior. Clumped or aggregated nesting is common in mammals such as prairie dogs, birds such as swallows, and basis-nesting wasps and bees. Is information technology possible that the underside of a single, specific bridge is a perfect nesting habitat for swallows (see Chapter xiv) while none of the bridges up- or downstream are suitable? What about large clusters of other types of nests (Effigy thirteen.nine)? Living in shut proximity increases competition for food and enhances the chances for transmitting diseases and parasites. Clusters of nests might also attract predators. What possible benefits could outweigh these major disadvantages? 2 that might immediately come to mind are collective defence and easy availability to mates, along with the previously discussed do good of finding food past observing other animals foraging.

Figure xiii.nine. Aggregations of animals and nests: (A) oropendolas, (B) cormorants, (C) seals, and (D) cliff swallows.

 Photos: Ben Pless (seals), Michael Brood (oropendolas, cormorants, and cliff swallows).

Across these iii hypotheses to explain aggregated nests—defence force, mates, and information sharing—there is no clear full general answer to the question of benefits that outweigh the disadvantages of group living. Information technology may be that microenvironmental variation is more important than humans understand, so a particular nesting site seems superior to the animal, but for reasons that are not obvious to united states. (Umwelt remains important!)

Key Term

Philopatry is the render, in a later breeding flavour, to the site where an beast was born.

It may also exist that young prefer to nest where their parents nested; the success of the parents may predict success of the adjacent generation in the same spot. This is chosen philopatry, and every bit generations laissez passer and descendants accumulate, nesting populations may grow in a location, even though nesting together carries no particular advantage. Philopatry is a bourgeois choice of nesting site which relies on the prediction, fabricated through evolutionary feel, that because the beast's parents survived and reproduced in a location, that spot remains an adequate nesting site. Because the brute does not compare and assess other potential sites, philopatric choices are fabricated based on limited information and may only be optimal if the cost of assessing other potential sites is high. The combination of philopatry and unproblematic allure to other animals of the same species tin can pb to large nesting aggregations occupying a few sites in areas which seem to take many acceptable nesting sites. 29

Of Special Interest: Ladybird Beetle Aggregations

One of life's mysteries is why some insects, such equally ladybird beetles, overwinter in aggregations of hundreds or thousands of individuals (Figure 13.10). Every year, entomologists are flooded with telephone calls and due east-mails from curious members of the public who have establish such a pile of beetles and want to know why the beetles aggregate. There'south no articulate respond to this question, but let's consider a couple of hypotheses for why they and other aggregating animals might do this:

1.

The beetles may simply all exist attracted to the same ecology characteristic, and so in that location's no detail reward or selective value in aggregating; they all only like the same place.

2.

They may be attracted to each other; this would be an example of how public information provides a key element backside an interesting beliefs.

Effigy 13.10. An aggregation of ladybird beetles.

 Photograph: Jeff Mitton.

From studies of the beetles, nosotros know that they like to state on lighter-colored places, but that lonely wouldn't explain how they amass. 30–32 In terms of why they aggregate, the two primary ideas are that wintering equally a group assists in thermoregulation as they insulate each other, and that the groups aid them choose mates, which occurs in the jump before they exit the aggregation.

Read total chapter

URL:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128015322000131